One of the biggest issues I've seen with the "average" [non-community] guy is that he hasn't given himself permission to get pussy.

Maybe his looks are above-average, maybe his style is above-average and maybe he's actually pretty confident past the first 30 seconds, but the second he puts himself in a situation where there's chicks around- all that goes out the window.

He's waiting for something.

Maybe an IOI, maybe some sort of green light, maybe even a sign from God, "Claim that pussy!!"

Here's the deal- give yourself permission to hit on girls.

This is version 2.0 of "Do What You Want > Don't Be Reactive"

The previous version communicated my message-

Doing what you want, 99% of the time will be the RIGHT decision even if there are consequences.

In the discussion, however, I talked about an incident that suggested I advocated violence. I don't. The example I gave was extreme, just like most everything else on GoodLookingLoser.com. So to be more realistic, I am going to present some hypotheticals that you might actually run into. When and if you do, heed my advice, "Do what you want, don't worry about 'being reactive' because a seduction guru or pick up artist told you so."

If you trust your instincts, you'll have no regrets and it will the "right" decision 99% of the time.

We're getting you guys real-time pick up video soon.

This is a snippet of "What is Screening Game?"

This is what I say and how I say it when I screen girls. (first 30-90seconds of the interaction)

Process summary-

Walk up

I recently saw a comment/critique of GoodLookingLoser.com where a guy suggested that our 'aggressive' mindsets and techniques ONLY worked on (and will ONLY work on) "slutty" (aka sexually active and sexually experienced) women.♠

Some guys think- Good, that's kind of chicks that I want, I'm not into "working on" prudish girls for months at a time.

I have issue this the assertion that being aggressive "ONLY" works on "sluts," however.

♠ Usually guys make this type of assertion [excuse] so they can try to rationalize why it's okay for them to not be aggressive and not having balls, so that's an element in play here. Further, guys that assert that an aggressive approach ONLY lands "sluts" have generally never tried it- simply because real-time experience would show them otherwise. For that mater, guys that assert this have generally not been too successful with women- simply because being "not aggressive" is not very effective, productive or efficient at getting large quantities of women.

From experience, I know that this is far from true.

Screening "Game"

You guys know that I encourage developing your "screening game," I got an email recently that suggested that I haven't really defined this whole "screening" thing.

One very important thing to understand is that "screening" is a mindset or a mentality, not a technique. It is not like "qualification," where you use a certain technique or line to convince the girl that you have standards or you are an alpha male. Although I suggest certain lines/techniques (such as: Hey, I know this is a little random, but I thought you were attractive and I wanted to come what you were like...) It doesn't really matter what words you use.

Screening is a mindset where you are simply profiling the girl to see what her deal is (is she sexually available that specific moment in time?).

That is all.